tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7997519634483923122.comments2022-02-10T09:36:29.294+01:00Paladins - We create a better worldPaladinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00254102764109527032noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7997519634483923122.post-39431805741468520312009-05-16T23:15:00.000+02:002009-05-16T23:15:00.000+02:00Thanks Sandy, exactly my point!Thanks Sandy, exactly my point!Paladinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00254102764109527032noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7997519634483923122.post-51676704279626789882009-05-16T23:14:00.000+02:002009-05-16T23:14:00.000+02:00Hi Anders!
Good question! If we start with a defi...Hi Anders!<br /><br />Good question! If we start with a definition of a business model: "a representation of how an organization makes (or intends to make) money." <br /><br />For me a new business model would be to have a whole new value proposition, while the value proposition would be more or less the same in business model innovation. Instead you would change all the other parameters, i.e customer relations, financing, infrastructure. Hope that clarified my thoughts.Paladinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00254102764109527032noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7997519634483923122.post-36838301890049082962009-02-21T11:24:00.000+01:002009-02-21T11:24:00.000+01:00Tja!Could you elaborate more on a new business mod...Tja!<BR/>Could you elaborate more on a new business model versus business model innovation? <BR/><BR/>As innovation per definition is a new way of doing something, may it be incremental or radical, business model innovation should per definition create a new business model or?<BR/><BR/>//Anders<BR/>TheBusinessModelDatabase (tbmdb.com)Anders Sundelinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02704816433435557846noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7997519634483923122.post-83169100855698614862009-01-27T20:47:00.000+01:002009-01-27T20:47:00.000+01:00Great point -- one that most managers don't get. C...Great point -- one that most managers don't get. Control makes them less anxious, even if it doesn't help them solve any problems. It's so easy to assume that problems are simple, when they rarely are.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7997519634483923122.post-85939874042614079412009-01-22T11:32:00.000+01:002009-01-22T11:32:00.000+01:00ush ja de är inget skoj alls när man har sina egna...ush ja de är inget skoj alls när man har sina egna rutiner och någon kommer och bryter dem :P jo får hoppas det :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7997519634483923122.post-20766554181272008782009-01-20T17:53:00.000+01:002009-01-20T17:53:00.000+01:00Stort grattis till Obama, jag tror att han kommer ...Stort grattis till Obama, jag tror att han kommer göra sig riktigt bra som president :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7997519634483923122.post-15915968061379594312009-01-11T18:27:00.000+01:002009-01-11T18:27:00.000+01:00Hi! Thank you for commenting! Yes, I believe prest...Hi! <BR/><BR/>Thank you for commenting! Yes, I believe prestige is one factor. But I think the most important part is that we all have learned to act and do things in a certain way. Today's leaders learned from yesterday's leaders and so on. It's about what Peter Senge calls "mental models". It is hard to break out of our thought patterns and the behavior is reinforced by connecting with like minded people every day. I guess we will see quite a revolution when generation X and Y takes over. Completely different views on leadership and cooperation from earlier generations. /JonasPaladinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00254102764109527032noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7997519634483923122.post-83157352005752628112009-01-11T18:17:00.000+01:002009-01-11T18:17:00.000+01:00Hi,:) Well James Bond was taken so...That's a vali...Hi,<BR/><BR/>:) Well James Bond was taken so...<BR/><BR/>That's a valid question. I guess I should have mentioned that. By the industrial paridigm" I mean the way our organizations are built and the underlying assumptions.<BR/>- dominant hierarchies. CEO, managers, employees. Chain of command. <BR/>- Information flows to the top where decisions are made.<BR/>- No transparency. Employees get information on a need to know basis (based on what management thinks are needed).<BR/>- work specialization and departmentalization.<BR/>and more to be covered in later posts.<BR/><BR/>The basic features of the industrial paradigm, control and efficiency, comes from the mass production era. Efficiency was defined as minimizing mistakes as production stops were very costly. <BR/><BR/>The underlying assumptions were that workers were lazy and untrustworthy. Hence supervision was needed (theory x). I will go into more detail on this subject as well in coming posts. Thanks!Paladinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00254102764109527032noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7997519634483923122.post-38866779399428246542009-01-11T17:59:00.000+01:002009-01-11T17:59:00.000+01:00Hi "Paladin" (cool name!)I was just reading your p...Hi "Paladin" (cool name!)<BR/>I was just reading your post and I wonder what you indicate by "industrial paradigm"?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7997519634483923122.post-36668963490480119672009-01-11T17:56:00.000+01:002009-01-11T17:56:00.000+01:00I totally agree! Why are they complicating things?...I totally agree! Why are they complicating things? Prestige? <BR/>Never heard of Yasuhiko before. Will have a look as it seems interesting. Thanks!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com